Soluble ACE2 as a Risk or Prognostic Factor in COVID-19 Patients: A Cross-sectional Study
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
Article activity feed
-
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2021.05.02.21256329: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Ethics IRB: The study also has been approved in ethics committee of Tehran University of medical sciences with ethic code: 99/11/101/16529. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Table 2: Resources
No key resources detected.
Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:It could be because there was no correlation or due to limitation of our sample size. In the present study, we did not find a significant …
SciScore for 10.1101/2021.05.02.21256329: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Ethics IRB: The study also has been approved in ethics committee of Tehran University of medical sciences with ethic code: 99/11/101/16529. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Table 2: Resources
No key resources detected.
Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:It could be because there was no correlation or due to limitation of our sample size. In the present study, we did not find a significant difference in the serum ACE2 levels of the two groups of patients, which is aligned with similar studies [17,18]. However, we find that serum ACE 2 level was rise in patients with severe disease, who finally expired. Some studies hypothesized that, A significant increase of serum ACE2 activity may act as an endogenous nonspecific protective mechanism against SARS-CoV-2 infection that preceded the recovery of patients [19]. A study by Emilsson et al [20], suggested that upregulation of ACE2 levels may reflects severity of outcome in COVID-19. Besides, it seems that serum ACE activity on admission did not reflect disease severity [18]. Further studies are required for confirmation of association between serum ACE 2 and COVID-19 severity. It was suggested that, Measurement of serum ACE2 antibody titers would help to identify who is likely to progress into acute respiratory distress, particularly in patients with cardiovascular disease and hypertension [21], Therefore, it might be possible to use serum ACE2 as indicator of ARDS.
Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.
-