Methods of An Open - Label Proof - of - Concept Trial of Intravenous Valproic Acid for Severe COVID-19

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article

Abstract

Introduction. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is the systemic entity caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) that may cause death through severe atypical pneumonia and acute lung injury. Valproic acid (VPA) has shown anti-inflammatory activity and intrinsic antiviral effect. These properties warrant the study of VPA as a possible active treatment in people with severe COVID-19. Material and Methods. Consecutive adult patients needing invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) will be given intravenous (IV) VPA at a starting dose of 20 mg/kg/day and up to 60/kg/day (in 60 min IV infusions in 250 mL normal saline) as needed to reach plasma VPA concentrations of 50-100 μg/mL (measured every 72 h). These patients will be followed-up for 10 days for the primary outcome and for a further period of 30 days after treatment completion for the secondary outcome of recurrence. The primary study outcome is the reduction in the case fatality rate (CFR) of at least 50 % after 10 days of treatment (as compared with natural history). Secondary outcomes are the reduction of length of stay (LOS) of at least 50 %, as well as COVID-19 recurrence at 30-day follow-up. The most important safety outcomes are acute liver failure, acute pancreatitis, and thrombocytopenia. Conclusions. Although long-term adverse effects and even pro-inflammatory consequences have been reported with the chronic use of VPA, the study of VPA is justified from a scientific standpoint given the urgent need for a drug against COVID-19 to shorten the high mortality and LOS.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2020.04.26.20079988: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Institutional Review Board Statementnot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power AnalysisHence, the sample size was calculated to detect a minimum of (but not restricted to) 50% reduction in the CFR from 40% to 20%, with 80% study power and 5% type I error.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    No key resources detected.


    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.