Impact of Inducer Tip Clearance on Cryopump Performance
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Inducers play a critical role in pump operation by providing a preliminary pressure boost to suppress cavitation. The size of the tip clearance directly influences a pump’s operational efficiency. To investigate the impact of tip clearance on a pump’s hydraulic performance and its behavior under cavitation conditions, this study combines experimental and numerical simulation approaches. Numerical computations of the full flow field, including the inducer and a two-stage impeller, were performed for five liquefied natural gas (LNG) cryogenic inducers with different tip clearances. The accuracy of the numerical simulation results was validated by comparing them with the experimentally obtained hydraulic performance curves. The results yield cavitation performance curves, pressure distributions at incipient cavitation, vapor volume fraction contours, and leakage flow streamlines for various tip clearances. The impact of tip clearance on the overall hydraulic performance and cavitation behavior of the LNG inducer was systematically examined, with particular attention given to the microscopic evolution of the Tip Leakage Vortex (TLV) during the initial stages of cavitation. The experimental results indicate that for every 0.2 mm increase in the inducer tip clearance, the pump head decreases by approximately 1 m, the efficiency drops by about 0.2%, and the tip leakage flow rate increases by approximately 5 m3/h. Furthermore, under cavitation conditions, the cavitation area expands as the tip clearance increases. A critical clearance value, δ, exists within the range of 0.4 mm to 0.6 mm, which governs the development pattern of the TLV. When the clearance is smaller than δ, the TLV forms more rapidly, and cavitation development is significantly more sensitive to increases in tip clearance. Conversely, when the clearance exceeds δ, the formation of the TLV is delayed, and cavitation progression becomes less responsive to further increases in tip clearance.