Social Determinants and Outbreak Dynamics of the 2025 Measles Epidemic in Mexico: A Nationwide Analysis of Linked Surveillance Data
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Measles resurgence threatens elimination achievements in the Americas. We conducted a nationwide analysis of Mexico’s 2025–2026 measles outbreak, integrating individual-level surveillance data from the Special Surveillance System for Febrile Exanthematous Diseases with municipal-level social determinants from eight national databases, complemented by molecular surveillance data. We analyzed 6892 confirmed cases using spatial autocorrelation (Moran’s I and LISA), effective reproduction number estimation, logistic regression models for municipal case presence, and multivariable logistic regression for risk factors for complications. Cases concentrated in Chihuahua (65.2%), with 47 LISA hot-spot municipalities containing 64.4% of cases. Molecular surveillance confirmed two independent introductions: D8/MVs/Ontario.CAN/47.24 (98.1%), linked to the North American outbreak, and B3 (1.9%) in Oaxaca. Transmission followed a three-stage pattern: introduction through seasonal agricultural worker networks, amplification in undervaccinated communities, and diffusion to marginalized indigenous populations. A dual-model analysis revealed that school non-attendance among children aged 6–14 years may have mediated the effect of very high marginalization on municipal case presence (OR 1.26; p < 0.001), identifying a potentially actionable vaccination pathway. Vaccine effectiveness was 98.1%, confirming susceptible accumulation rather than vaccine failure. Wave-stratified analysis showed late outbreak phase as an independent risk factor for complications (aOR 1.68, 95% CI: 1.42–2.00), converging with an age of <1 year (aOR 3.36), indigenous status (aOR 1.89), and unvaccinated status (aOR 1.96) in the most marginalized communities. Indigenous individuals comprised 29.1% of cases but 76% of the 25 deaths. This outbreak demonstrates that national vaccination thresholds are insufficient when municipal pockets of susceptibility remain systematically underserved.