Emergence and Spread of SARS-CoV-2 Lineages B.1.1.7 and P.1 in Italy
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
Italy’s second wave of SARS-CoV-2 has hit hard, with more than three million cases and over 100,000 deaths, representing an almost ten-fold increase in the numbers reported by August 2020. Herein, we present an analysis of 6515 SARS-CoV-2 sequences sampled in Italy between 29 January 2020 and 1 March 2021 and show how different lineages emerged multiple times independently despite lockdown restrictions. Virus lineage B.1.177 became the dominant variant in November 2020, when cases peaked at 40,000 a day, but since January 2021 this is being replaced by the B.1.1.7 ‘variant of concern’. In addition, we report a sudden increase in another documented variant of concern—lineage P.1—from December 2020 onwards, most likely caused by a single introduction into Italy. We again highlight how international importations drive the emergence of new lineages and that genome sequencing should remain a top priority for ongoing surveillance in Italy.
Article activity feed
-
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2021.03.24.21254277: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Table 2: Resources
Software and Algorithms Sentences Resources Three separate alignments were performed using MAFFT implementing the L-INS-I algorithm and manually inspected for accuracy using Geneious Prime(r) 2021.1.1 (https://www.geneious.com)24. MAFFTsuggested: (MAFFT, RRID:SCR_011811)Geneious Prime(rsuggested: NoneA maximum likelihood tree was estimated for each lineage using IQ-TREE implementing the following: Hasegawa-Kishino-Yano nucleotide substitution model with a gamma distributed rate variation among sites (HKY+Γ) and an … SciScore for 10.1101/2021.03.24.21254277: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Table 2: Resources
Software and Algorithms Sentences Resources Three separate alignments were performed using MAFFT implementing the L-INS-I algorithm and manually inspected for accuracy using Geneious Prime(r) 2021.1.1 (https://www.geneious.com)24. MAFFTsuggested: (MAFFT, RRID:SCR_011811)Geneious Prime(rsuggested: NoneA maximum likelihood tree was estimated for each lineage using IQ-TREE implementing the following: Hasegawa-Kishino-Yano nucleotide substitution model with a gamma distributed rate variation among sites (HKY+Γ) and an ultrafast bootstrap method (1000 repetitions)25,26. IQ-TREEsuggested: (IQ-TREE, RRID:SCR_017254)Results from OddPub: Thank you for sharing your data.
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
-