Daylight Evaluation of Static and Kinetic Horizontal Shading Systems for Sustainable Visual Comfort: Experimental Illuminance Measurements and Calibrated Simulation

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Adaptive façade systems are increasingly used to mitigate glare in daylit spaces and improve visual comfort while supporting sustainable daylight utilisation and reduced reliance on electric lighting in buildings. However, their performance is often evaluated using illuminance-based metrics or uncalibrated simulations, limiting the reliability of glare assessment. This study proposes a calibrated experimental–simulation framework for evaluating glare reduction achieved by a kinetic horizontal shading system (KSS) under real daylight conditions. The approach integrates reduced-scale physical measurements with Radiance-based simulations using a digitally reconstructed twin of the experimental setup. Two geometrically identical test chambers positioned side-by-side—a static reference chamber and a kinetic chamber equipped with six adaptive fins (0.63 m real-scale depth)—were investigated using a 1:20 scale mock-up. Internal illuminance measurements were normalised between chambers, and a sky-scaling procedure was applied to calibrate simulated sky luminance distributions against measured data on an hourly basis, enabling photometrically validated HDR renderings for glare evaluation. Glare performance was analysed for three representative clear-sky days during periods of maximum solar exposure (11:00–17:00) under late-summer conditions at approximately 51° N latitude in Wrocław, Poland. Visual comfort was assessed using Daylight Glare Probability (DGP), Daylight Glare Index (DGI), and veiling luminance (Lveil). The kinetic shading system reduced mean DGP from 0.57 to 0.35 (−38%) and peak glare values by nearly half compared with the static configuration, while veiling luminance decreased by 73%, indicating substantial improvement in physiological visual comfort. These results demonstrate that adaptive fin movement effectively suppresses both perceptual and physiological glare during critical daylight hours. The proposed calibrated experimental–simulation workflow provides a robust and transferable methodology for evaluating the glare performance of adaptive façade systems and supports sustainable daylight management by enabling high daylight availability while maintaining acceptable glare levels in buildings.

Article activity feed