Breaking the Urban Carbon Lock-In: The Effects of Heterogeneous Science and Technology Innovation Policies on Urban Carbon Unlocking Efficiency

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Digital technologies such as big data are reshaping resource allocation, raising interest in whether and how heterogeneous science and technology innovation (STI) policies can help unlock urban carbon lock-in. Using panel data for 286 prefecture-level cities in China from 2009 to 2023, this paper examines the relationship between heterogeneous STI policy intensity—classified as supply-side, demand-side, complementary-factor, and institutional-reform policies—and urban carbon unlocking efficiency. We develop a mechanism-based framework and empirically assess (i) the moderating roles of digital infrastructure, science and technology finance, and government green attention, and (ii) spatial spillover effects using spatial econometric models. The results show that all four policy types show a significant positive association with local carbon unlocking efficiency, with institutional-reform policies exhibiting the strongest association. When the four types are included jointly, only supply-side and demand-side policies retain statistically significant direct associations. Heterogeneity analyses indicate that demand-side, complementary-factor, and institutional-reform policies are more strongly associated with efficiency gains in low-pollution cities, whereas supply-side and demand-side policies have a stronger association in high energy-consuming cities. Mechanism analysis reveals that regional digital infrastructure exerts a selective moderating effect on the relationship between heterogeneous sci-tech innovation policies and urban carbon emission reduction efficiency. It positively reinforces the effectiveness of supply-side, demand-side, and institutional reform-oriented policies, while its interaction with complementary policies is statistically insignificant. Technology finance and government green policies function as a “resource catalyst” and an “institutional guarantee” respectively, significantly enhancing the correlation between heterogeneous sci-tech innovation policies and urban carbon emission reduction efficiency. Finally, carbon unlocking efficiency displays significant spatial dependence: the intensity of supply-side and institutional-reform policies is positively associated with carbon unlocking efficiency in neighboring cities, while complementary-factor policies exhibit a negative spatial association. Overall, the findings provide empirical evidence to inform the design and coordination of heterogeneous STI policy portfolios aimed at improving urban carbon unlocking efficiency.

Article activity feed