Intraocular Inflammation Following Intravitreal Faricimab: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Read the full article

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background/Objectives: To evaluate the incidence, characteristics, and clinical outcomes of intraocular inflammation (IOI) associated with intravitreal faricimab (IVF) in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and CENTRAL databases was performed from their inception to February 2025. Using the random-effects model, weighted proportions, standardized mean differences, and weighted log odds ratios (OR) were pooled and calculated. A two-tailed p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. The χ2 (z) test and the Higgins I2 test were used to assess studies heterogeneity. Results: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of 24 studies (4761 patients; 5652 eyes). The most common diagnoses were nAMD (n = 4782, 94.6%) and DME (n = 845, 37.1%). The pooled proportion for IOI incidence in eyes receiving IVF was 3.0% (95% CI: 1.0–6.0). The odds of developing IOI did not differ significantly between the DME and nAMD groups (OR: 1.13, p = 0.78). Unspecified IOI was the most common sign (n = 210, 2.9% [95% CI: 1.2–7.3]), followed by anterior uveitis (n = 80, 1.9% [95% CI: 0.1–34.8]), vitritis (n = 63, 2.9% [95% CI: 0.2–32.1]), retinal hemorrhage (n = 27, 0.7% [95% CI: 0.0–15.3]), and endophthalmitis (n = 8, 0.5% [95% CI: 0.3–1.1]). Conclusions: While IVF demonstrates therapeutic efficacy, our findings highlight a clinically relevant risk of IOI. We, therefore, recommend vigilant clinical monitoring in patients receiving this therapy.

Article activity feed