Limitations of Frontier Orbital and Charge Approaches in the Description of Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

DFT calculations at the B3LYP/aug-cc-pVDZ level of theory on some aromatic substrates showed that in the HOMO (Highest Occupied Molecular Orbital) of nitrobenzene, the atomic coefficients are not in agreement with the meta-directing behavior of this compound. The atomic coefficients are the same in the ortho and in the meta positions. The HOMO (or NHOMO (Next Occupied Molecular Orbital) in the case of benzaldehyde) is not in agreement with the experimental results when deactivating, meta-orienting compounds are considered. Mulliken charges sometimes are not able to explain the observed reactivity. Hirshfeld charges allow us to predict the orientation of the attack of an electrophile on the aromatic ring, with the exception of nitrobenzene. Both HOMO atomic coefficients and charges are in agreement with the experimental results when deactivating, ortho-para orienting, and activating compounds are tested.

Article activity feed