Does the Selected Segment Within a Two-Legged Hopping Trial Alter Leg Stiffness and Kinetic Performance Values and Their Variability?

Two-legged hopping is a well-established model for assessing leg stiffness; however, in existing studies, it is unclear whether the trial segment selection affects the results. This study aimed to assess if the selected hopping segment alters the value and individual variability (%CVind) of leg stiffness and kinetic performance metrics. Elite women athletes (42, volleyball, basketball, handball) and 14 non-athletic women performed barefoot two-legged hopping (130 bpm) on a force-plate (Kistler, 9286AA, sampling at 1000 Hz). Leg stiffness was estimated from the Fz registration (resonant frequency method). Four cumulative range segments (1–10, 1–20, 1–30, and 1–40 hops) and three segments of 10-hop subranges (11–20, 21–30, and 31–40) were analyzed (repeated measures one-way Anova, p ≤ 0.05, SPSS v30.0). The hopping segment did not significantly alter the leg stiffness value (segment average 30.6 to 31.2 kN/m) or its %CVind (segment average ≈ 3%). The kinetic performance metrics depicted a solid foundation for the extracted leg stiffness value, with %CVind not exceeding 6.2%. The results indicate a data collection of just 15 hops, in continuance reduced to a 10 hops segment (after excluding the first five to avoid neuromuscular adaptation) as a robust reference choice.