Comparative Analysis of Non-Negative Matrix Factorization in Fire Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study of Semi-Mediterranean and Semi-Arid Regions

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Semi-Mediterranean (SM) and semi-arid (SA) regions, exemplified by the Kurdo-Zagrosian forests in western Iran and northern Iraq, have experienced frequent wildfires in recent years. This study proposes a modified Non-Negative Matrix Factorization (NMF) method for detecting fire-prone areas using satellite-derived data in SM and SA forests. The performance of the proposed method was then compared with three other already proposed NMF methods: principal component analysis (PCA), K-means, and IsoData. NMF is a factorization method renowned for performing dimensionality reduction and feature extraction. It imposes non-negativity constraints on factor matrices, enhancing interpretability and suitability for analyzing real-world datasets. Sentinel-2 imagery, the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) Digital Elevation Model (DEM), and the Zagros Grass Index (ZGI) from 2020 were employed as inputs and validated against a post-2020 burned area derived from the Normalized Burned Ratio (NBR) index. The results demonstrate NMF’s effectiveness in identifying fire-prone areas across large geographic extents typical of SM and SA regions. The results also revealed that when the elevation was included, NMF_L1/2-Sparsity offered the best outcome among the used NMF methods. In contrast, the proposed NMF method provided the best results when only Sentinel-2 bands and ZGI were used.

Article activity feed