Bedside Ultrasonography-Guided Nasogastric Tube Placement: Scoping Review

Objectives: This scoping review synthesized the available evidence on bedside ultrasonography used to confirm short-term nasogastric tube (NGT) placement in adults. Methods: The review followed JBI Collaboration methodology. Searches were conducted in CINAHL, Embase, LILACS, PubMed, and Scopus, as well as in gray literature sources (Google Scholar and ProQuest Dissertation & Thesis Global). Primary studies and clinical guidelines addressing bedside ultrasonography for short-term NGT placement in adults (≥18 years) were eligible, with no limits on language or publication year. Data were extracted and narratively summarized with the I-AIM framework (Indication, Acquisition, Interpretation, and Decision-Making). Results: Twenty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Most were single-center observational studies performed in intensive care units or emergency departments. Ultrasound was primarily used for confirmation prior to enteral nutrition initiation, while gastric decompression was less frequently reported. Acquisition protocols varied, although supine positioning, convex abdominal probes, and linear cervical probes were most commonly described. The gastric antrum and esophagus were the principal anatomical landmarks, with interpretation based on direct tube visualization and dynamic fogging; color Doppler was occasionally used. Radiography remained the reference standard in most studies, and only a minority initiated feeding based solely on ultrasound findings. Reported facilitators included bedside feasibility, absence of radiation exposure, and timeliness. Barriers included operator dependency, limited visualization in patients with obesity or gas interposition, protocol heterogeneity, and the limited methodological robustness of available studies. Conclusions: Current evidence suggests that ultrasonography may represent a feasible, radiation-free bedside approach for confirmation of NGT placement. Evidence from selected studies suggests that, with structured training, healthcare professionals may achieve diagnostic accuracy in specific clinical settings, although further robust multicenter investigations are needed to confirm these findings.