Burnout Among Italian Medical Doctors: A Cross-Sectional Study on Emotional Exhaustion, Depersonalization, and Gratification Post-COVID-19

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background: Burnout is a growing concern among medical doctors, particularly in high-pressure environments, which has been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. This study investigates the prevalence and determinants of burnout among physicians working in a large hospital in Southern Italy. Methods: This online cross-sectional survey evaluated burnout and emotional distress among physicians and trainees at Catania Hospital using the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) and General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12). Data collection (July–August 2025) incorporated strict anonymity to mitigate social desirability bias. Statistical analyses, including chi-squared tests with Tukey adjustments and Pearson correlations, were stratified by sex and specialization area to identify significant psychological associations. Results: High levels of burnout were observed across all dimensions: 76.7% of respondents reported low personal gratification, 70.8% showed high depersonalization, and nearly 50% experienced high emotional exhaustion. Female physicians and recent graduates (after 2020) exhibited significantly lower levels of gratification and higher psychological distress. Service-area professionals reported lower emotional exhaustion, but also lower gratification compared to surgical specialties. Notably, otorhinolaryngology showed both the highest burnout risk and the highest gratification scores. Conclusions: Burnout is alarmingly prevalent among Italian medical doctors, and there is significant variation across sexes, graduation cohorts, and medical specialties. Despite the high burnout levels identified, the cross-sectional design and non-probability sampling necessitate a cautious interpretation of these findings. Future longitudinal research involving larger, more representative cohorts is essential to validate these results and inform targeted institutional interventions.

Article activity feed