Energy Efficiency and Decarbonisation Pathways in Injection Moulding: A Life Cycle Assessment of End-of-Life Allocation Methods

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is extensively employed to support sustainability evaluation in waste management and manufacturing systems; however, outcomes are highly sensitive to methodological decisions, particularly end-of-life (EoL) allocation approaches. This study examines how cut-off and substitution approaches affect the energy performance and decarbonisation potential of high-density polyethylene (HDPE) injection moulding systems. A dual framework is adopted: first, a literature review examines methodological sensitivities in EoL modelling; second, a quantitative case study assesses industrial-scale primary data for the production of durable HDPE bottles (300 mL). The LCA model integrates specific technical parameters, including a 220 °C melt temperature and a 36 s cycle time, ensuring a realistic representation of manufacturing conditions. The results indicate that allocation choices significantly influence calculated impacts, sometimes reversing the relative ranking of configurations. Substitution-based approaches report higher benefits by crediting avoided primary production, while cut-off logic provides more conservative estimates. Quantitative analysis shows that transitioning from open-loop to fully closed-loop configurations reduces cumulative energy demand by 3.2% and freshwater emissions per functional unit by 2.8%. Furthermore, the study identifies a ‘landfill paradox’ specific to HDPE waste within transitional energy systems: due to the carbon sequestration effect of landfilled polymers and current grid emission factors, landfilling exhibits a lower net carbon footprint (0.03 kg CO2-eq./kg) than high-efficiency incineration (1.54 kg CO2-eq./kg). These findings highlight that circular economy evaluations are strongly shaped by methodological assumptions, with direct implications for energy policy. Bridging the gap between specific industrial processing parameters and end-of-life allocation logic underscores the need to incorporate primary industrial data and transparent allocation frameworks to support reliable decision-making in the transition toward low-carbon and energy-efficient manufacturing systems.

Article activity feed