Contrast Volume Reduction in Oncologic Body Imaging Using Dual-Energy CT: A Comparison with Single-Energy CT

Background/Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility of reducing contrast volume in oncologic body imaging using dual-energy CT (DECT) by (1) identifying the optimal virtual monochromatic imaging (VMI) reconstruction using DECT and (2) comparing DECT performed with reduced iodinated contrast media (ICM) volume to single-energy CT (SECT) performed with standard ICM volume. Methods: In this retrospective study, we quantitatively and qualitatively compared the image quality of 35 thoracoabdominopelvic DECT across 9 different virtual monoenergetic image (VMI) levels (from 40 to 80 keV) using a reduced volume of ICM (0.3 gI/kg of body weight) to determine the optimal keV reconstruction level. Out of these 35 patients, 20 had previously performed SECT with standard ICM volume (0.3 gI/kg of body weight + 9 gI), enabling protocol comparison. The qualitative analysis included overall image quality, noise, and contrast enhancement by two radiologists. Quantitative analysis included contrast enhancement measurements, contrast-to-noise ratio, and signal-to-noise ratio of the liver parenchyma and the portal vein. ANOVA was used to identify the optimal VMI level reconstruction, while t-tests and paired t-tests were used to compare both protocols. Results: VMI60 keV provided the highest overall image quality score. DECT with reduced ICM volume demonstrated higher contrast enhancement and lower noise than SECT with standard ICM volume (p < 0.001). No statistical difference was found in the overall image quality between the two protocols (p = 0.290). Conclusions: VMI60 keV with reduced contrast volume provides higher contrast and lower noise than SECT at a standard contrast volume. DECT using a reduced ICM volume is the technique of choice for oncologic body CT.