Implementation of Mycoplasma genitalium Diagnostics with Macrolide-Resistance Detection Improves Patient Treatment Outcomes in Bulgaria

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The increasing prevalence of Mycoplasma genitalium infections with macrolide-resistance, causing high azithromycin failure rates, is a major concern internationally. In response to this challenge, diagnostics that simultaneously detect M. genitalium and genetic markers for macrolide-resistance enable the therapy to be individually tailored, i.e., to implement resistance-guided therapy (RGT). This study aimed to evaluate patient treatment outcomes of M. genitalium therapy, guided by a macrolide-resistance assay in Bulgaria. Methods: Consecutively referred M. genitalium infection cases (n = 17) were analyzed for macrolide-resistance mutations (MRMs) and specific antimicrobial treatment was recommended accordingly (MRMs-negative infections received azithromycin and MRMs-positive infections received moxifloxacin). The treatment outcome based on test-of-cure was recorded, and the treatment failure rates and time to achieve a microbiological cure were compared to treatment outcomes in patients treated before the implementation of RGT. Results: Among patients given RGT (n = 17), the overall treatment failure rate was 1/17 (5.9%). This was significantly lower than the rate (47.6%) observed in patients treated pre-RGT (p = 0.002). The time to achieve a microbiological cure was 29.4 days (CI 24.5–34.3), compared to 45.2 days (CI 36.5–53.7) pre-RGT (p = 0.001). Conclusions: The implementation of M. genitalium diagnostics with macrolide-resistance detection improved treatment outcomes in Bulgaria, with significantly lower treatment failure rates and reduced time to achieve a microbiological cure. In light of the limited treatment options and concerns about their decreasing efficacy in response to misuse and overuse, a diagnostic macrolide-resistance assay is critical to direct the appropriate first-line treatment, to maintain the efficacy of antimicrobial treatment (antibiotic stewardship) and to minimize the spread of antimicrobial resistance.

Article activity feed