Marginal and Internal Fit of Zirconia Crowns with Varying Yttria Content and Finish Line Configurations: An In Vitro Study
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Aim: This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the marginal and internal fit of three monolithic CAD/CAM zirconia ceramics with different Y-TZP contents, prepared with chamfer and rounded shoulder finish lines. Methods. Sixty monolithic zirconia crowns were fabricated and divided into three groups (n = 20) based on their yttria content: (1) multilayer zirconia consisting of a dentin layer of 3 mol% yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (3Y-TZP) and an incisal layer of 5 mol% partially stabilized zirconia (5Y-PSZ), (2) shade-gradient zirconia fully composed of 3Y-TZP, and (3) shade-gradient zirconia containing 4 mol% partially stabilized zirconia (4Y-PSZ). Each group was further divided into two finish line configurations (chamfer and rounded shoulder). Marginal and internal gaps were measured using the silicone replica technique under a stereomicroscope by a single operator. Data were analyzed using three-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test (α = 0.05). Marginal and internal gaps were assessed using the silicone replica technique under a stereomicroscope by a single operator. Statistical analysis was performed with three-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc test (p < 0.05). Results: The occlusal region exhibited the largest gap values, while the axial region showed the smallest across all groups. Mean marginal and internal gaps were 33.79 µm for chamfer and 43.37 µm for rounded shoulder finish lines. Zirconia with higher Y-TZP content demonstrated significantly greater gap values than those with lower percentages (p < 0.05). Significant interactions were found among finish line design, material type, and measurement region (p < 0.05), with rounded shoulder margins showing larger gaps (p = 0.001). Conclusions: Y-TZP content significantly affects marginal and internal adaptation, with higher percentages associated with increased gap values. Both finish line types produced clinically acceptable fits, although chamfer margins provided superior adaptation.