Analysis of Wind-Induced Effects and Vibration Control of a Cable-Supported Bridge with a Steel Truss Girder in Strong Marine Wind Environments
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
This study aims to analyze the wind-induced effects and vibration control of a long-span cable-stayed bridge with a steel truss girder under strong marine wind conditions during its maximum single-cantilever state. During the cantilever construction stage of cable-stayed bridges, the reduction in structural stiffness and damping may lead to excessive wind-induced responses, affecting construction accuracy and safety. Focusing on a newly constructed sea-crossing railway cable-stayed bridge with a steel truss girder and a main span of 364 m, this research utilizes field-measured data and finite element simulations to analyze the buffeting responses of the bridge in the maximum single-cantilever state during construction. The vibration suppression effects of different wind-resistant measures are compared, and we propose an economical and efficient vibration mitigation solution. The results indicate that using the turbulent field parameters and unit aerodynamic admittance function recommended in JTG/T 3360-01—2018 Wind-resistant Design Specification for Highway Bridges leads to conservative in predictions regarding the buffeting responses, and this approach can be used in the preliminary design of large-span bridges. The measured turbulent field parameters can effectively estimate the bridge buffeting responses, especially in the transverse direction. Measuring wind speeds at the bridge site is crucial for the rational design and construction of cable-stayed bridges in strong marine wind environments. The effectiveness of vibration reduction decreases in the order of temporary piers, inclined struts, tuned mass dampers, and wind-resistant cables. The inclined strut scheme achieved vibration reductions of 84.45% in the transverse direction and 68.17% in the vertical direction, slightly lower than those of the auxiliary pier scheme (89.04% and 85.47%). However, the installation of temporary piers during the construction of a sea-crossing bridge would significantly increase construction costs, whereas the inclined strut scheme requires only temporary steel structures near the main tower and piers without substantially increasing the construction workload. Therefore, the inclined strut scheme is recommended as an effective and economical vibration control measure for large-span sea-crossing cable-stayed bridges.