A Biosocial Perspective to Understand Antimicrobial Prescription Practices: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study from a Public Community Health Center in North India

Background: It is well established by research that large-scale and indiscriminate prescribing, dispensing, and use of antimicrobials drive antimicrobial resistance (AMR) endangering the health and well-being of people, animals, and the environment. In the context of low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), the prescribing of antimicrobials is often not based on biomedical rationality but involves alternative logic driven by social, cultural, and institutional factors. This paper seeks to develop a “biosocial” perspective, reflecting a unified perspective that treats the biomedical and social conditions as two sides of the same coin. Methods: This analysis is based on an empirical investigation of prescription slips that patients carry to buy drugs from the pharmacy following an outpatient department encounter with the clinician. Data collection involves mixed methods, including the quantitative analysis of the antimicrobials prescribed and a qualitative analysis of the underlying reasons for these prescriptions, as described by doctors, pharmacists, and patients. Data analysis involved triangulating quantitative and qualitative data, to develop a “biosocial” perspective, which can provide implications for the development of antimicrobial stewardship policies, particularly relevant for health institutions in low- and middle-income countries. Results: Our analysis of 1175 prescription slips showed that 98% contained antimicrobials, with 74% being broad-spectrum antimicrobials. Only 9% of cases were advised antimicrobial sensitivity testing (AST) before initiating treatment. Qualitative findings indicated that patients had poor awareness of antimicrobials and pharmacists played a crucial role in counseling. Conclusions: This study highlights that antimicrobial prescriptions in public health settings are influenced by both biomedical and social factors, supporting a biosocial perspective. Although AMS interventions are predominantly biomedical, adhering to clinical standards and best practices, this study underscores the necessity of integrating a biosocial viewpoint by incorporating the experiences of pharmacists and patient groups. Strengthening diagnostic support, patient education, and interprofessional collaboration could improve rational antimicrobial uses in low-resource settings.