Development and validation of chest CT-based imaging biomarkers for early stage COVID-19 screening

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is currently a global pandemic, and early screening is one of the key factors for COVID-19 control and treatment. Here, we developed and validated chest CT-based imaging biomarkers for COVID-19 patient screening from two independent hospitals with 419 patients. We identified the vasculature-like signals from CT images and found that, compared to healthy and community acquired pneumonia (CAP) patients, COVID-19 patients display a significantly higher abundance of these signals. Furthermore, unsupervised feature learning led to the discovery of clinical-relevant imaging biomarkers from the vasculature-like signals for accurate and sensitive COVID-19 screening that have been double-blindly validated in an independent hospital (sensitivity: 0.941, specificity: 0.920, AUC: 0.971, accuracy 0.931, F1 score: 0.929). Our findings could open a new avenue to assist screening of COVID-19 patients.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2020.05.15.20103473: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    NIH rigor criteria are not applicable to paper type.

    Table 2: Resources

    Experimental Models: Cell Lines
    SentencesResources
    Statistical Analysis: The difference in the vasculature-like signals among different groups (COVID-19, CAP and healthy) was assessed by non-parametric test, and the association between signatures and COVID-19 by logistic regression.
    COVID-19
    suggested: None
    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    Visualization of these imaging biomarkers was created in three-dimensional space using ITK-Snap (version 3.8.0), Python (version 3.7.0), Matplotlib (version 3.1.2), Blender (version 2.82) and Three.js (version r115 on GitHub).
    ITK-Snap
    suggested: (ITK-SNAP, RRID:SCR_002010)
    Python
    suggested: (IPython, RRID:SCR_001658)
    Matplotlib
    suggested: (MatPlotLib, RRID:SCR_008624)
    Blender
    suggested: (Blender, RRID:SCR_008606)
    Principle component analysis (PCA) and heatmap cluster analysis were performed in R (version 3.6.1) and MATLAB (version 2012b), respectively.
    MATLAB
    suggested: (MATLAB, RRID:SCR_001622)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.