Human Surfactant Protein D Binds Spike Protein and Acts as an Entry Inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2 Pseudotyped Viral Particles

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

Human SP-D is a potent innate immune molecule whose presence at pulmonary mucosal surfaces allows its role in immune surveillance against pathogens. Higher levels of serum SP-D have been reported in the patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV). Studies have suggested the ability of human SP-D to recognise spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV; its interaction with HCoV-229E strain leads to viral inhibition in human bronchial epithelial (16HBE) cells. Previous studies have reported that a recombinant fragment of human SP-D (rfhSP-D) composed of 8 Gly-X-Y repeats, neck and CRD region, can act against a range of viral pathogens including influenza A Virus and Respiratory Syncytial Virus in vitro , in vivo and ex vivo . In this context, this study was aimed at examining the likely protective role of rfhSP-D against SARS-CoV-2 infection. rfhSP-D showed a dose-responsive binding to S1 spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 and its receptor binding domain. Importantly, rfhSP-D inhibited interaction of S1 protein with the HEK293T cells overexpressing human angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (hACE2). The protective role of rfhSP-D against SARS-CoV-2 infection as an entry inhibitor was further validated by the use of pseudotyped lentiviral particles expressing SARS-CoV-2 S1 protein; ~0.5 RLU fold reduction in viral entry was seen following treatment with rfhSP-D (10 µg/ml). These results highlight the therapeutic potential of rfhSP-D in SARS-CoV-2 infection and merit pre-clinical studies in animal models.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2020.12.18.423418: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Institutional Review Board Statementnot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Cell Line Authenticationnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Antibodies
    SentencesResources
    In a parallel experiment, the wells were washed and then incubated with polyclonal rabbit anti-human SP-D primary antibody (0.5 μg/ml) (1:5000) for 2 h at room temperature.
    anti-human SP-D
    suggested: None
    Next day, the wells were washed and then incubated with anti-sheep IgG-HRP antibodies or anti-His antibodies (Genetex, GTX628914, 0.5 μg/ml) (1:2000) for 2 h.
    anti-sheep IgG-HRP
    suggested: None
    For the detection of RBD binding, the wells were further incubated with anti-mouse IgG antibody (Abcam, ab6728, 0.5 μg/ml) (1:2000) for 2 h.
    anti-mouse IgG
    suggested: (Abcam Cat# ab6728, RRID:AB_955440)
    Following PBS washes, the cells were probed with goat anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L) Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody linked to Alexa Fluor 647 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) (0.6 μl/100 μl per tube) for 1 h at room temperature in dark.
    anti-Rabbit IgG
    suggested: None
    For binding experiments using rfhSP-D, SARS-CoV-2 S1 protein containing a C-terminal His-tag (Acro; S1N-C52H3) (5 μg/ml) was tagged with anti-His antibody (Genetex; GT395) (1:100) at 4°C for 1h and followed by pre-incubation with a series of two-fold dilutions of rfhSP-D (10 μg/ml) or mock (cells only) at 4°C for 1h.
    His-tag
    suggested: None
    anti-His
    suggested: None
    After washing, coverslips were blocked with 2% w/v BSA for 1h and incubated with ACE2 antibody [SN0754] (1:250) (GeneTex, GTX01160), followed by Goat anti-rabbit IgG (H+L) cross-adsorbed secondary antibody (1:500) (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 1 h at room temperature in dark.
    ACE2
    suggested: (Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# MA5-32307, RRID:AB_2809589)
    GTX01160
    suggested: None
    Experimental Models: Cell Lines
    SentencesResources
    Cell culture and treatments: Human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293T or HEK293T cells overexpressing ACE2 receptor (HEK293T-ACE2) were cultured in complete Gibco Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM), supplemented with 10% v/v fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 U/ml penicillin (Sigma-Aldrich) and 100 μg/ml streptomycin (Sigma-Aldrich), and left to grow at 37°C in the presence of 5% v/v CO2 for approximately 48 h before passaging.
    HEK
    suggested: CLS Cat# 300192/p777_HEK293, RRID:CVCL_0045)
    293T
    suggested: None
    HEK293T cells were seeded one day before, and then transfected with the indicated plasmids using TransIT®-LT1 transfection reagent (Mirus).
    HEK293T
    suggested: NCBI_Iran Cat# C498, RRID:CVCL_0063)
    HEK293T-ACE2 cells (HEK293T cells overexpressing ACE2 receptor) (0.5×105 cells) were preincubated with rfhSP-D (0, 5, 10 and 20 μg/ml) for 24 h and then washed twice with PBS.
    HEK293T-ACE2
    suggested: None
    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    Statistical Analysis: GraphPad Prism 6.0 software was used to generate all the graphs.
    GraphPad
    suggested: (GraphPad Prism, RRID:SCR_002798)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We found bar graphs of continuous data. We recommend replacing bar graphs with more informative graphics, as many different datasets can lead to the same bar graph. The actual data may suggest different conclusions from the summary statistics. For more information, please see Weissgerber et al (2015).


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.