Filling Monitoring Gaps for Data-deficient Species Using Annual Occupancy Predictions from Co-occurrence Models

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Fragmented surveys and limited monitoring exclude most invertebrate species from conservation policy. We present a framework that generates annual occupancy predictions using species distribution models (SDMs) to reconstruct missing trends—not to extrapolate trends, but to fill them in (the fill-in approach). Instead of filtering poor-data regions and years or relying on static environmental variables, we use co-occurrence patterns (COP) to capture year-to-year shifts in species assemblages, to enable temporal prediction across all recorded habitats using sparse, presence-only datasets from multiple sources. Applied to four rare native ladybugs across North America (2007–2021), COP models exceeded reliability benchmarks (Accuracy > 0.70, AUC > 0.70, Kappa > 0.40, Brier < 0.25) across standard test splits, structurally distinct sources, and temporally divided periods. This indicates that annual predictions were robust to temporal bias arising from varying data volume and source composition, as supported by negligible effects in multiple regression. Predicted 10-year declines (9–31%) closely aligned with independent long-term regional monitoring data, operationalizing IUCN Red List classifications (from “Least Concern” to “Vulnerable”) in the absence of standardized monitoring. By translating fragmented observations—primarily from citizen science—into standardized annual trend estimates, the fill-in approach extends extinction risk assessment to data-deficient taxa long excluded from conservation frameworks.

Article activity feed