Jeopardizing Happiness. “No One Can Coerce Me To Be Happy in His Way”

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Starting from classical philosophical suggestions about the status of happiness recipes that suggest the optimal ways to reach it I will soon illustrate the fundamental Kantian suggestion: “No one can coerce me to be happy”, that is an individual has the right to choose its own kind of happiness “provided he does not infringe upon that freedom of others to strive for a like end which can coexist with the freedom of everyone in accordance with a possible universal law”. I will conclude that happiness (and even its very possibility) is constrained in a relational interplay in a collective of human beings. Thanks to the events that took place during the notorious “enclosures”, which violently expropriated peasants by destroying their homes and cottages during the so-called primitive accumulation of capitalism, I will provide a very clear example of the relational nature of happiness and even its potential to be jeopardized. The idea of a “moral bubble” will be proposed as an explanation for why some people fail to recognize the harm they create when they jeopardize the happiness of other humans. A study of the current predatory neoliberal capitalism's peculiar propensity to make the majority of people unhappy will be the focus of the last section.

Article activity feed