When science isn’t beautiful: The effect of lab space aesthetics on participant performance of two Color Stroop tasks

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Aesthetic experiences are a universal and constant phenomenon, affecting our decision making, job performance, and emotional reactivity. While the effects of aesthetic experiences reach far beyond the simple appreciation of art, most research in the field still focuses on subjective ratings of fine art. The current study explored the effect of decorating a lab space on a participant's inhibitory control and emotional reactivity. First, we used an online survey to confirm that participants found the aesthetic room (i.e., decorated lab space) more pleasing and comforting, and expressed a greater willingness to work in that space compared to the bare room. Next, participants performed a Proportion Congruent Stroop task to examine inhibitory control and a Emotion Vocabulary Stroop task to test inhibitory control in the context of emotional stimuli, or their emotional reactivity. Average response times on both tasks were faster in the aesthetic room, while accuracy did not differ between the rooms. These results suggest that participants in the bare room were less efficient at task performance. This research provides a controlled and standardized attempt at understanding the role that aesthetics plays in our daily lives by elaborating on the, understudied, link between aesthetics and inhibitory control.

Article activity feed