The Black–White Mortality Crossover: Evidence from Linked U.S. Administrative Mortality Records

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

First documented in 1930, the Black–White mortality crossover remains one of the most enduring puzzles in Demography. Black Americans experience higher age-specific mortality rates than White Americans throughout most of the life course, yet this pattern reverses at advanced ages. A leading explanation is that there is no crossover at all. Rather, differential age misreporting or other data errors create a spurious crossover. We use a large-scale administrative cohort dataset of American men (N = 2.3 million deaths) to assess whether the Black–White mortality crossover is real or an artifact of data error. We find a mortality crossover for the male birth cohorts of 1890–1905 at age 86. At age 75, Black men have nearly a 10% higher probability of dying than White men, but by age 95, the probability of dying is 8% higher for White men. The quality of our mortality data, paired with a series of sensitivity analyses, provides new evidence that the observed crossover is not an artifact of age misreporting. Our findings address a long-standing empirical debate and emphasize the need for further investigation into alternative explanations of the crossover, including selective survival mechanisms and reversals of group-specific disadvantage at advanced ages.

Article activity feed