Personal Health Budgets for children with complex medical needs: a rapid scoping review

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

BackgroundChildren and young people with complex medical needs are increasingly supported at home by family carers, often with statutory healthcare funding. In England, Personal Health Budgets (PHBs) are promoted as mechanisms to increase choice and control in how healthcare funding is used, yet evidence on their use in children’s complex care remains limited.AimTo map and synthesise existing evidence on the experiences and outcomes of children and young people with complex medical needs and their families accessing PHBs or comparable self-directed health funding schemes.MethodsA rapid scoping review was conducted following PRISMA-ScR guidance. Eight academic databases were searched alongside targeted grey literature sources, including national bodies, third-sector organisations, and all 42 Integrated Care Boards in England. Sources published between 2010 and January 2026 were screened and charted. Eligible sources addressed children/young people with complex medical needs (and/or families) and examined experiences or outcomes of accessing PHBs in England or comparable health-funded self-directed schemes internationally; social care-only budgets were excluded. Data were synthesised thematically across academic and grey literature.ResultsTwenty-six sources were included (10 peer-reviewed studies and 16 UK grey literature sources). Three higher-order themes were identified: (1) the promise of choice and control alongside burden transfer to family carers; (2) system conditions shaping PHB viability, including workforce stability, information infrastructure, governance, and transitions; and (3) uneven distribution of benefits and outcomes, with a clear equity gradient linked to family resources and local system context.ConclusionsPHBs and comparable schemes can enable continuity and relational care for families of children with complex medical needs, but often do so by redistributing labour and risk onto family carers. Without adequate system support, PHBs risk amplifying inequities rather than delivering equitable personalised care. Substantial gaps remain in UK empirical evidence, highlighting the need for further research to inform the design of sustainable, joined-up models of care.

Article activity feed