Validation of the Index of Relative Rurality Against Contemporary USDA and Census Measures

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Defining and measuring rurality is a persistent challenge for researchers and policymakers. Threshold-based classifications often create artificial distinctions, failing to capture the continuous nature of the rural-urban spectrum. The Index of Relative Rurality (IRR) developed by Waldorff (2006) offers a continuous, multi-dimensional measure to address this shortcoming. This paper provides a contemporary validation of the IRR, testing a 2020 version of the index against the 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes (RUCC), the 2024 Urban Influence Codes (UIC), and 2020 Decennial Census data on county-level rural population. Using ordered logistic regression, the IRR was found to be a highly statistically significant predictor of both RUCC and UIC classifications, explaining approximately 21% and 15% of their respective variances. Linear regression analysis revealed that the percentage of a county's rural population accounts for a substantial 57.4% of the variance in the multi-dimensional IRR score. These findings confirm that nearly two decades after its inception, the IRR remains a robust and relevant tool. It aligns closely with official governmental classifications while offering a more granular, multi-faceted perspective on rurality, underscoring its continued value for research and policy analysis.

Article activity feed