Quantifying Land Power Evaluating the ADE Model and Its Implications for Civilian Oversight

This article revisits the Armored Division Equivalent (ADE) model to explain two inflection points in the Russo-Ukrainian wars. Re-calibrating ADE for training levels, readiness and high-impact weapons, it shows that Ukraine’s drastic post-2010 force reductions created a quantifiable “power vacuum” that enabled Russia’s 2014 Crimea operation. Conversely, the U.S. air-lift of roughly 3,000 Javelin ATGMs before February 2022 produced a “technological surprise”: when Javelins are folded into ADE, local force ratios around Kyiv shrink from 12:1 to about 3:1, matching Russia’s failure to seize the capital. The study argues that such transparent, open-source modelling can alert policymakers to emerging imbalances, temper symbolic deployments like NATO’s Enhanced Forward Presence, and strengthen democratic civilian oversight. While ADE cannot predict outcomes where leadership or morale dominate, it remains a tractable baseline for deterrence planning and arms-control talks, provided its limits in irregular warfare are acknowledged.