Imposter participants? Towards a reflexive epistemology of ‘suspected participants’

This paper explores the phenomenon of "imposter" participants in online qualitative research. Drawing on two UK-based projects which investigated intersections of health, sexuality, and social connections during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, we assess the challenges posed by suspected participants. The term "imposter participants" is critically examined, suggesting instead "suspected participants" to acknowledge the researchers' role in generating suspicion. We argue for a reflexive epistemology that questions normative assumptions about authentic participation, advocating for the inclusion of suspect data as an interpretive tool rather than a problem needing ‘screening out’. This approach reframes participant “suspicion” as an opportunity to understand fragmented identities and complex motivations in modern social contexts.