Legitimacy, Embedding, and Learning: A Framework for Scaling Up Complex Psychosocial Interventions

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Objective: To propose a multi-level framework to facilitate the sustainment and scale-up of complex evidence-based psychosocial interventions across mental health, social care, and employment systems.Methods: Integrative review of 41 empirical studies on contextual determinants of Individual Placement and Support (IPS) sustainment and scale-up, interpreted through implementation science, policy implementation research, and welfare policy literature.Results: Three mechanisms were identified as crucial for sustaining and scaling up: Policy Legitimacy: normative acceptability and institutional compatibility that enables mandates and political-administrative authorization; Policy Embedding: coherence of multi-level, cross-sector governance arrangements that routinise the intervention beyond pilots; and Policy Learning: cumulative implementation evidence infrastructure enabling comparable measurement, feedback, and authorized adaptation.Conclusion: The proposed Legitimacy–Embedding–Learning (LEL) Framework for Scale-Up holds that scaling complex interventions is a configuration challenge within complex systems, rather than a linear dissemination task. The framework may support proactive adaptation when scaling IPS and similar interventions.

Article activity feed