The Case for Using Educational Scholarship to Improve Peer Review

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Peer review is broken. Reviewer comments often lack constructiveness, clarity, and consistency. For decades, educational scholarship has provided evidence-based, theoretically informed, and robust interventions for the provision of effective feedback. I argue, therefore, that the key to fix peer review lies within the educational literature.

Article activity feed