Perceptions of Agency Over Social Media Use Are Better Predictors of Well-Being Than Logged Usage Time

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

There is substantial concern that social media use (SMU) negatively impacts well-being. Building on the idea that subjective evaluations of SMU can shape well-being effects, this study examined how two social media mindsets—agency and valence—relate to self-reported and logged SMU, and four well-being indicators (depression, anxiety, stress, life satisfaction) among a sample of young adults (N = 1858, M = 21.01, SD = 3.14) in South Africa. The results replicate, extend and sometimes contradict previous findings in this regard. Agency mindsets (perceptions of control over SMU) negatively correlated with SMU and positively with well- being, while valence mindsets (perceptions about SMU effects) were associated with higher SMU but not to well-being. Logged SMU showed weaker associations with mindsets and well- being compared to self-reported SMU, suggesting differences between perceived and actual use. These findings highlight the importance of users' sense of control, more so than SMU duration or valence mindsets, in predicting well-being.

Article activity feed