No Effect of Acknowledging Resistance or Using Autonomy-Supportive Language in Vlogs on Sustainable Consumption Intentions of Emerging Adults

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

The production and consumption of red meat is a major source of environmental harm, underscoring the need to reduce red meat consumption. Emerging adults (ages 18-25 y/o) are disproportionately affected by the future consequences of climate change. However, meat eaters often react negatively to the promotion of plant-based alternatives. In this study, we tested whether acknowledging resistance and using autonomy-supportive language can promote a more sustainable diet in emerging adults. The online experiment used a 2 (acknowledging resistance: yes vs. no) x 2 (autonomy-supportive language: yes vs. no) factorial between-subjects design in which participants were exposed to a vlog. Our Bayesian analyses show that emerging adults experience less controlling intent and more autonomy support in the autonomy-supportive language conditions. But acknowledging resistance or using autonomy-supportive language is not effective in altering the sustainable consumption intentions. Potentially, using autonomy-supportive language decreases the persuasiveness of the message in the vlog.

Article activity feed