Psychometric Validation of the Diagnostic Assessment for Research and Treatment for Alcohol Use Disorder

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Aims: Structured clinical interviewing is considered the gold standard in psychiatric diagnosis. The Diagnostic Assessment and Research Tool (DART) is a novel modularized semi-structured interview; however, no studies have examined the psychometric properties of its alcohol use disorder (AUD) module. The primary aims of this study were: (1) to validate the factor structure of the DART AUD module and (2) to examine measurement invariance across several key demographic and subgroup factors.Methods: Participants were community members in Hamilton, Canada and Boston, USA who self-identified as making a significant recovery attempt from problematic alcohol use (N = 499). Internal reliability was examined via the Kuder-Richardson 20 statistic, and correlations between symptom count and drinking quantity/frequency were examined. Then, symptom-level data were included in a confirmatory factor analysis to examine model fit of a single hypothesized factor structure. Finally, measurement invariance of the factor were conducted for sex, age, ethnicity (White vs. racialized), and study site. Results: This study found evidence for adequate internal reliability (rKR20 = 0.75), and symptom scores correlated with drinking quantity and frequency (r = 0.16 - 0.43). CFA suggested indices of the unidimensional one-factor AUD model were excellent (χ2 = 0.092, CFI = 0.99, TLI = 0.99, SRMR = 0.06, RMSEA = 0.02). Measurement invariance analyses revealed that the factor structure was equivalent between sex, age, ethnicity, and study site. Conclusions: Together, these findings provide strong evidence for psychometric properties of the AUD DART module and provide psychometric evidence supporting its use in research and clinical practice.

Article activity feed