Cortical Speech Envelope Tracking Reflects Lesion-Symptom Profiles in Post-Stroke Aphasia

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background: Comprehending connected speech is critical for human interaction and is vulnerable in post-stroke aphasia. However, the neural mechanisms responsible for impaired speech listening remain largely unknown. Neural speech tracking methods offer a window into naturalistic speech processing and may reveal causal contributions to comprehension. Methods: EEG was recorded during story listening in 15 PWA with left temporal lesions, 14 PWA with left frontal lesions, and 15 age- and hearing-matched controls. All participants listened to clear and unintelligible stories. Controls additionally listened to low-intelligibility stories that equated comprehension success to the temporal group. Envelope tracking was measured at syllable- (theta) and multi-syllable- (delta band) rates. Neural decoding and encoding analyses measured global (whole-brain) and local (sensor-wise) speech tracking, respectively. Group comparisons used linear mixed-effects regression. Linear and quadratic relationships assessed associations between neural tracking and behavioural measures of comprehension while accounting for covariates (age, hearing, lesion volume, attention/alertness).Results: The temporal group showed significantly impaired comprehension compared to both frontal and control groups. Comparison of intelligible and unintelligible speech found that intelligibility affected delta but not theta tracking – suggesting that delta tracking is linked to higher-order linguistic processing and theta tracking reflects sensory responses. Theta and delta envelope decoding reflected group/comprehension status: tracking was reduced in the temporal group compared to the control group but tracking was equalised when control comprehension was behaviour-matched via speech degradation. Delta encoding produced a similarly behaviour-linked pattern, but theta encoding was lesion- rather than behaviour-sensitive, in that reduced tracking was observed in temporoparietal sensors in both aphasia groups. Theta tracking correlated with comprehension in a lesion-specific manner. Positive correlations between theta tracking and comprehension were found in the temporal group and negative correlations in the frontal and control groups. This produced a quadratic (inverted-U) relationship between theta tracking and comprehension success across participants.Conclusions: Envelope tracking reflects a combination of lesion and symptom-profiles and is a viable method for investigating the neural basis of speech comprehension impairments in aphasia. PWA with frontal lesions displayed relatively retained comprehension and speech envelope tracking and produced a control-like, negative theta tracking-comprehension correlation, implying increased listening effort with greater task difficulty. In PWA with comprehension impairments and left temporal lesions, envelope tracking at syllable-rates may support the extraction of lexical-semantic information and speech understanding.

Article activity feed