Evaluating the effectiveness of psychological therapy in prehabilitation pathways for cancer patients

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background: Prehabilitation aims to optimise patients’ physical and psychological readiness for surgery. Evidence for exercise-based prehabilitation is well-established, but evidence on the effectiveness of embedded psychological therapy in cancer prehabilitation remains limited.Aims: To evaluate whether brief, rapid‑response psychological therapy embedded within a multimodal cancer prehabilitation pathway improves mental health and functional outcomes, and to compare outcomes for patients who received specialist psychological support versus those who did not .Methods: This study applied a non‑randomised, prospective cohort comparison design using routine data from two UK NHS multimodal prehabilitation services. Participants were cancer patients using the prehabilitation pathway who reported clinically significant symptoms of anxiety and/or depression. Analysis 1 examined longitudinal change in depression and anxiety in patients referred for specialist psy chological support (n = 135) across baseline, mid‑therapy, and post‑intervention. Analysis 2 compared standardised mean differences in affective and functional outcomes for patients who accessed psychological support (n = 60) with eligible patients who declined (n = 418).Results: In Analysis 1, mean depression scores decreased by 54.1% and anxiety by 39.2%, with recovery rates comparable to and achieved in fewer sessions than national benchmarks for NHS Talking Therapies. In Analysis 2, both groups improved across all measures; standardised mean differences were numerically larger in the supported group for depression, anxiety, and sit‑to‑stand assessments. Conclusions: Initial indications suggest that embedding brief psychological input within prehabilitation is associated with clinically meaningful improvements in both mental health and functional outcomes linked to recovery. F urther research with randomised controlled designs is warranted to confirm causality and inform implementation.

Article activity feed