Networks of Loneliness and Social Connection in Late Adolescence: The Role of Socio-economic Marginalisation and Earlier Bullying Experiences.

Read the full article

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Introduction: Adolescents from low socio-economic backgrounds report higher rates of loneliness, than their high socio-economic status peers. Reasons for this vulnerability remain unclear. We investigated how peer bullying and family conflict (age 10-15 years) and loneliness and social connection (age 16-24 years) related at different levels of socio-economic marginalisation. Methods: Using data from the UK Household Longitudinal Survey (N=2,531), we captured loneliness and social connection at 16-24 years and bullying and family conflict at 10-15 years. Network analysis tested item-level relationships, whilst controlling for others. We devised a socio-economic marginalisation score, based on household income related to community average household income, to classify participants into high and low groups and to compare networks across groups. Results: Most central items in the full sample network were talking to family about worries, talking to friends about worries, and relying on friends (16-24 years), and peer bullying (10-15 years). Distinct facets of loneliness linked to specific social connection and bullying experiences. For example, feeling left out was associated with feeling let down by friends (w=-.10), feeling less understood by friends (w=-.05). Whereas feeling isolated was associated with feeling less understood by family (w=-.11) and less understood by friends (w=-.04). Peer bullying related to feeling more left out (w=.05) and more isolated (w=.04). Some associations (e.g., feeling less let down and less criticised by family) were stronger in the high socio-economic marginalisation group, who also reported more severe bullying. Conclusion: Evidence suggested family relationships remain important in late adolescence. Findings highlight the value of item-level dynamics for targeted support. Past bullying, feeling let down, left out and isolated may be key intervention targets, especially for adolescence experiencing high socio-economic marginalization.

Article activity feed