Explaining how electoral non-participation perpetuates political powerlessness raises young people’s voting intentions

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Objective: Young people’s low electoral turnout in the U.K. perpetuates a vicious cycle of political underrepresentation and disengagement, undermining democratic quality and stability. We addressed a prevailing psychological motivator of youth non-voting: a perception of political powerlessness. We experimentally evaluated an empathetic refutation approach that explained how electoral non-participation perpetuates political powerlessness while affirming young people’s psychological reasons for not voting.Method: We conducted two experiments with British 18-29-year-old participants who had not voted in the 2024 UK General Election (total n = 935) to test whether reading a conversation that explained the vicious cycle of non-participation using an empathetic refutation (both experiments) or an assertive structure (Experiment 2) increased participants’ voting intentions relative to a control condition featuring an unrelated conversation.Results: Both types of explanations significantly increased participants’ voting intention compared to the control. Participants found the empathetic refutation approach to be most acknowledging of the non-voter’s perspective, but reported no significant differences in how compelling they found the explanations or their levels of trust and openness to the information presented.Conclusions: Explaining the vicious cycle of non-participation could help to improve young people’s willingness to participate in the electoral process.Keywords: democracy; voting; trust; empathy; attitude roots; affirmation; youth vote

Article activity feed