Do Emotional Faces Modulate Pupillary Pseudoneglect?

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Pseudoneglect, a subtle attentional bias toward the left visual field in neurotypicalindividuals, can be measured with a split-screen paradigm in which a bright stimulus inone hemifield elicits stronger pupil constriction when it appears on the left than on theright (Strauch et al., 2022). Replications of this method have reported mixed results,including a large Registered Report that replicated the effect with a small effect size (d= -0.31). Given strong left-field biases in the emotional chimeric face test, the presentstudy (n = 53) combined this task with split-screen pupillometry to test whetheremotional face processing amplifies pupillary pseudoneglect. Pupillary pseudoneglectwas observed during control trials with scrambled faces (d = -0.36) and was numericallystronger for emotional faces (d = -0.76), but this difference was not significant. A strongleft-field bias was confirmed for emotional face judgements (d = -0.76), which did notcorrelate with pupillary bias (ρ = -0.26), and for a line bisection task (d = -0.47), whichalso did not correlate with pupillary pseudoneglect (ρ = -0.19). These data support thesplit-screen pupillometric method for measuring pseudoneglect and replicate the patternthat leftward biases across tasks show little statistical relation to one another.

Article activity feed