Newer is not always better: A person-centered approach to reappraisals reveals a non-linear relationship between originality and effectiveness

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

The well-established efficacy of reappraisal as an emotion regulation (ER) strategy derives from reinterpreting negative situations. Research suggests that this reinterpretation process shares neuropsychological operations with standard tasks of creativity, a domain fittingly concerned with novelty and effectiveness. How individuals generate reappraisals and judge them for these features is critical, as it can provide insight into clinically-relevant judgment processes and also inform subsequent ER stages like implementation. However, prior work on reappraisal generation and judgments has several gaps by focusing primarily on healthy adults, assuming a linear correspondence whereby reappraisals perceived to be the most effective are those that are most original (clashing with trade-off theories in creativity psychology), and ignoring within-person variability in methodological and statistical procedures. We conducted two pre-registered studies addressing these gaps using a within-person modeling approach. In Study 1, 164 participants generated 5,036 reappraisals to negative scenarios and rated their reappraisals on originality and anticipated effectiveness. In Study 2, 200 new participants rated a subset of the Study 1 reappraisals. Across both studies, the relationship between within-centered ratings of originality and effectiveness was better fit by a negative quadratic curve than a linear one, and individuals with the fewest depressive symptoms demonstrated the sharpest drop-offs in effectiveness at high originality. These studies suggest that idiosyncratically-tuned judgments of reappraisal features conform to a common psychological structure displayed across participants and samples, even when reappraisals are not self-generated. However, depression’s modulating effect points to aberrant regulatory processes at a meta-cognitive level that interferes on expectation judgments.

Article activity feed