When Measures Disagree: Evidence from the First-Person Shooter Task and Implicit Association Test

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Implicit bias is commonly assessed using a range of behavioral and cognitive measures; however, the extent to which these instruments capture the same underlying construct remains unclear. This study examined the relationship between the First-Person Shooter Task (FPST) and a Race-Weapon Implicit Association Test (RW-IAT) to evaluate convergence between two widely used measures of implicit bias. Participants completed both tasks in a controlled laboratory setting. Results replicated established patterns of shooter bias in the FPST; however, no significant relationship emerged between FPST performance and RW-IAT categorizations. These findings suggest that commonly used measures of implicit bias may not reflect a single, unified construct. The study raises important questions about construct validity and highlights the need for greater precision in measuring and interpreting implicit bias across research contexts.

Article activity feed