The Oxford Cognitive Screen (OCS-AU): Sensitivity and Specificity of a Stroke-Specific Cognitive Screening Tool

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background: Routine screening of cognitive and mental health is considered best practice post-stroke care. However, empirical evidence to support clinical interpretation of cognitive screening outcomes in relation to neuropsychological functioning and anxiety/depression symptoms is limited. Objectives: The aim of this study was to enhance evidence-based interpretation of the Oxford Cognitive Screen-Australian version (OCS-AU) performance by examining relationships between OCS-AU outcomes with neuropsychological constructs and specific anxiety/depression symptoms.Methods: Fifty-three stroke survivors within 12 weeks post-stroke in Australian rehabilitation services were recruited. Participants completed the OCS-AU, a neuropsychological test battery, the Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Correlations between OCS-AU outcomes with neuropsychological constructs, and anxiety/depression symptoms were analysed.Results: The OCS-AU subtests Hearts Cancellation, Picture Naming, Number Writing, and Gestural Imitation demonstrated significant correlations with their respective neuropsychological counterparts (r=0.35-0.72, p<0.05), unlike OCS-AU Memory and Executive Function subtests, which demonstrated inconsistent associations with corresponding neuropsychological constructs. OCS-AU domains demonstrated stronger associations with anxiety symptoms than depression symptoms, especially ‘Feeling nervous’, ‘Worrying thoughts’, ‘Trouble relaxing’ and ‘Irritability’ from the GAD-7, and ‘Psychomotor changes’ from the PHQ-9. OCS-AU Executive Function, Memory and Spatial Attention showed the most associations with anxiety and depression symptoms. Conclusions: These findings reveal variable associations between OCS-AU subtests and neuropsychological constructs, with notable limitations in memory and executive function, requiring supplementary assessment when deficits are suspected. Variable associations between OCS-AU domains and specific anxiety/depression symptoms underscore the importance of assessing both cognition and mental health for comprehensive post-stroke evaluation and intervention planning.

Article activity feed