The effectiveness of smartphone applications that target eating in facilitating weight loss at six months and longer: A meta-analysis and bias correction

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background/objectives: Smartphone applications (“apps”) could be cost-effective tools for weight loss that circumvent some of the issues of standard weight-loss interventions. Although numerous weight-loss apps are available, their results have been mixed and their longer-term efficacy remains unclear.Subjects/methods: We conducted a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials that used apps to target eating behaviour for weight loss in adults. A database search identified 23 studies, including multi-arm studies reporting more than one app-based trial. We meta-analytically (a) compared the amount of weight lost in app-based interventions to waitlists and non-app-based interventions, such as group sessions and self-monitoring, and (b) estimated mean weight loss at six months and longer in app-based interventions.Interventions/methods: We used three-level meta-analytic models which forgo the need to randomly select trials from multi-arm studies. Where publication bias was detected, we applied additional random-effects models and various bias-correction methods.Results: More weight was lost in app-based interventions than on waitlists (mean difference 2.07 kg [95%CI 1.09; 3.05], p < .001, k = 12) and in non-app-based control interventions (mean difference 1.64 kg [95%CI 0.25; 3.03], p = .024, k = 15) at six months. Across all app-based interventions (k = 27), weight loss estimates ranged from 0.63 to 3.87 kg at six months. At longer follow-ups (typically 12 months), mean weight loss was 2.64 kg [95%CI 1.70; 3.57], p < .001, k = 11). Despite high heterogeneity in meta-analytic estimates, we found no significant moderating effects of apps’ or interventions’ features such as calorie counting, social support, involvement of medical workers, or automatic feedback reports.Conclusions: More long-term studies are needed to clarify apps’ effectiveness over time. Smartphone apps could be a cost-effective alternative to traditional behavioural interventions and could help maintain weight loss following surgery or drug treatments.

Article activity feed