Generic AI or Nothing: Support-Seeking Patterns After Market Withdrawal of a Purpose-Built AI Wellbeing Tool

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background. Purpose-built AI wellbeing tools—designed with clinical safeguards for everyday emotional difficulties such as stress, grief, and relationship conflict—represent a growing category of digital mental health support. When regulatory actions disrupt access to such tools, users must navigate alternatives on their own; however, no empirical data exist on where they actually turn. This study examines the real-world impact of interrupted access to a purpose-built AI wellbeing tool on help-seeking behavior.Methods. Cross-sectional survey of 393 UK-based adults who had used a purpose-built AI wellbeing application within 90 days prior to its withdrawal from the UK market in January 2026. The survey assessed self-reported sources of emotional and mental health support following withdrawal, use of general-purpose AI tools, perceived changes in access to support, and subjective wellbeing. Free-text responses (n = 272) were analyzed using a hybrid thematic approach.Results. The most common primary sources of mental health support since losing access to a purpose-built AI wellbeing application were general-purpose AI tools (27%) and no support at all (26%). By contrast, just 13% transitioned to professional care. Among the 157 respondents reporting use of general-purpose AI for mental health support, the dominant motivations were instant access (78%) and cost (74%). Sixty percent reported worse access to support, rising to 81% among those who had not sought support since. Qualitative themes highlighted the perceived inferiority of general-purpose AI for mental health, distress at service loss, and valued features of purpose-built AI design.Conclusions. Removing a purpose-built AI wellbeing tool did not redirect users toward human-led mental health services; most turned to general-purpose AI or stopped seeking support entirely. Regulatory frameworks should account for real-world substitution effects when evaluating the risks and benefits of purpose-built AI tools for general wellness.

Article activity feed