Do Mindful Partners Make a Difference? A Meta-Analytic Test of the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model in Dyadic Couples

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Objectives: Mindfulness is consistently linked with individual well-being and relationship functioning, yet it remains unclear systemically whether mindfulness reliably “crosses over” within romantic couples — such that one partner’s mindfulness is associated with the other partner’s outcomes once dyadic interdependence is accounted for. We conducted a model-testing meta-analysis (MTMA) based on the Actor–Partner Interdependence Model (APIM) to estimate actor (self-self) and partner (self-partner) effects of mindfulness on couples’ relationship outcomes. Methods: We searched six databases (PsycINFO, PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Trials) for quantitative dyadic studies linking one partner’s mindfulness to the other partner’s outcomes across relational domains. Thirty-six independent studies (11,652 couples) met the inclusion criteria. We conducted a multivariate meta-analysis to estimate the six model-implied (APIM) correlations (r*), then computed path coefficients from these estimates. All effect sizes include 95% CIs from 1,000 bootstrap samples. Results: Cross-partner correlations were small but significant (rs* = .14 and .15 for male-to-female and female-to-male associations, respectively). However, corresponding APIM partner effects were close to zero and nonsignificant (βs = –.02 and –.01), indicating no reliable crossover. Actor effects were significant (βs =.21 and .21 for men and women, respectively). Interdependence effects were also significant for partners’ mindfulness (r* = .27) and outcomes (r* = .41), indicating meaningful within-couple covariation. Discussion: Overall, findings do not support a reliable direct partner effect, cautioning against assumptions that mindfulness gains in one partner reliably translate into parallel partner benefits. Implications include prioritizing dyadic processes and couple-level interventions. Limitations and future directions are discussed.

Article activity feed