Lifetime Prevalence of Nonfatal Firearm Victimization, Offensive Gun Use, and Defensive Gun Use in a National Sample of US Adults

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Importance: Firearm-related encounters have the potential for high risk of injury, but few studies have estimated the prevalence and co-occurrence among offensive gun use (OGU), defensive gun use (DGU), and nonfatal firearm victimization (NFV) in the same national probability sample. Objective: Estimate the lifetime prevalence of OGU, DGU, and NFV, their co-occurrence, and demographic correlates in a nationally representative sample of US adults.Design, Setting, and Participants: This study used data from the National Firearms, Alcohol, Cannabis, and Suicide (NFACS) survey, a probability-based sample of 7034 adults living in the US, that was in the fielded from May 27 to September 2, 2025. Main outcomes and measures: Primary outcomes were any lifetime occurrence of OGU, DGU, or NFV. Results: Lifetime prevalence was 5.2% (95% CI 4.5%-6.0%) for OGU, 12.6% (95% CI 11.5%-13.7%) for DGU, and 31.5% (95% CI 30.0%-33.0%) for NFV. Weighted to the US population, we estimate 13.9 million adults have used a gun offensively, 33.3 million defensively, and 83.3 million have experienced NFV in their lifetime. For each domain, most respondents (~80%) only reported incidents in which a gun was not discharged. There was a high rate of co-occurrence between OGU and DGU (OR = 33.8, 95% CI 22.7-40.9), and between NFV and OGU (OR = 5.3, 95% CI 3.9-7.2) and DGU (OR = 4.5, 95% CI 3.7-5.6). Gun usage and/or NFV was associated with older age, male sex, Black race, lower income and education, gun ownership, military service, and having a job that required carrying a firearm.Conclusion and Relevance: A large minority of Americans have had a victimization experience with firearms while a smaller but still significant proportion have used a gun for defense. It is important then that public policies minimize firearm-related harm while maintaining their societal benefits.

Article activity feed