COVID-19 Impacts on Children and Resources for Resilience: What is the Direction of Causation?

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

COVID-19 has profoundly affected children’s well-being. Resilience was often found to be negatively correlated with COVID-19 impacts. However, the role of resilience in directly shaping COVID-19 impacts on children remains unclear, as studies report conflicting evidence regarding the potential causal direction between COVID-19 impacts and resilience. Higher resilience could reduce COVID-19 impacts, while COVID-19 impacts may also disrupt or enhance resilience. Or it could be the case that the two are simply correlated due to shared underlying common factors. This preregistered study uses a twin-based Direction of Causation modeling approach with data from 1166 twins (age: M = 12.59; 50.78% male; 85.08% White) to explore the causal direction between COVID-19 impacts and resilience. Resilience was assessed using the Child and Youth Resilience Measure (CYRM) – Child Version, a child self-report questionnaire assessing resources available for children’s resilience. Findings revealed a causal effect such that resilience resources explained 32% variance in overall COVID-19 impacts, consistently buffering negative outcomes across multiple domains (e.g., social connections, general stress, COVID-related stress). A reciprocal causal effect was found for economic impacts, with resilience mitigating economic impacts and economic challenges enhancing resilience.

Article activity feed