Autistic and Non-Autistic Undergraduates’ Responses to a Textbook Vignette on Autism

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

College students may encounter deficit-focused content about autism in classes they take—content that could shape their beliefs about autism and, for autistic students, negatively affect their self-esteem. In this study, we asked how autistic (n=86) and non-autistic (n=86) undergraduates in the United States responded to a short vignette from a popular psychology textbook, which portrays an autistic child in potentially stigmatizing ways. Autistic participants—particularly those who reported stronger autistic identity—rated the vignette as more offensive and stigmatizing than did non-autistic participants. Autistic participants also rated the vignette as less useful for understanding autism than did non-autistic participants. Finally, more autistic than non-autistic students reported lower self-esteem after reading the vignette compared to before reading it. These findings highlight the potential harms of deficit-focused portrayals of autism in educational materials and underscore the need for more respectful representations.

Article activity feed