Network Temperature as a Metric of Stability in Depression Symptoms Across Adolescence

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background: Depression is characterised by diverse symptom combinations that can be represented as a network. While studies often focus on central symptoms for targeted interventions, less explored are parameters capturing the entire network, offering insights into system dynamics. We propose network temperature as a metric for psychological network stability, examining changes across adolescence, a critical period for depression development. Methods: We replicated our study across three cohorts, including 35,901 adolescents (ages 10-19) from the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development study (ABCD), Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC), and Millennium Cohort Study (MCS). Depression symptom networks were estimated using multi-group Ising models, deriving the temperature parameter (T) at multiple time points (T=1 at baseline). Network temperature captures stability by assessing node state alignment – symptoms being ‘on’ or ‘off’. Higher temperatures indicate less alignment and increased system randomness. We also investigated sex differences in network temperature to illustrate developmental variability in stratified groups.Results: Network temperature decreased across adolescence in all cohorts from baseline (ABCD T=0.60 [0.59-0.61], ALSPAC T=0.70 [0.69,0.71], MCS T=0.75, [0.74,0.76]), with the steepest decline in early adolescence. Within-person networks stabilised with age, while individual depression scores increased in variability. Male networks cooled faster and earlier than females’, which showed higher intra-network heterogeneity and decreased stability.Conclusions: Depression symptom networks stabilise, and symptom variability decreases across adolescence. Faster network cooling at earlier ages highlights a critical transition period where early intervention could be most effective. Sex differences suggest that stratifying by risk factors could inform optimal intervention timing.

Article activity feed