Motivation for Sport: A Comparison Between Perfectionism and Excellencism in Self-Determination Theory

Abstract Perfectionism creates motivational conflicts, but the extant literature repeatedly found positive associations between perfectionistic standards and autonomous motivation. Researchers did not distinguish between perfectionistic standards and the pursuit of excellence, which may explain their somewhat unexpected results. Based on the Model of Excellencism and Perfectionism (MEP), we recruited 328 sport participants to investigate the unique associations of perfectionism (i.e., perfectionistic standards) and excellencism with sport motivations. We hypothesized that perfectionism should primarily be associated with controlled types of motivation and amotivation, while excellencism would only predict autonomous types of motivation. As expected, results of structural equation modeling showed that excellencism was a positive and significant predictor of intrinsic, integrated, and identified motivation. Mean scores of introjected motivation, external motivation and amotivation were very low in this sample, thus we carried zero-inflated negative binomial structural equation modeling. The probability of reporting zero introjected motivation, external motivation and amotivation was positively associated with excellencism. The probability of reporting zero external motivation was negatively associated with perfectionism. We concluded that pursuing excellencism rather than perfectionistic standards should be encouraged, as it is associated with autonomous motivation in sport. Our results support the need to separate the pursuit of high and perfectionistic standards to better understand the sport motivation of perfection strivers. Our findings with sport participants are relevant to recreational sporting activities in which people participate mostly out of autonomous motivation.Keywords: Perfectionism, Excellencism, Motivation, Sport